That's a no
brainer for the Diva.
lol
Ed Scott did an interview with Michael Logan for TV Guide. Read it
here. Ed takes credit for saving Days and for the Emmy
noms. Peter
Reckell bashes
JER. Good for them.
ICAM Scott's stuff is what got the
noms, not anything that Tomlin did.
If you feel like rolling your eyes, go read Jamey Gibbons'
analysis at Daytime Confidential. You'd think with practically every
DOOL actor bashing
JER's writing he'd get the hint that the 90s weren't that great.
Jamey wrote: "TV Guide Magazine's
Michael Logan has a new
feature up begging the question did
Ed Scott, former co-executive producer of
The Young and the Restless, and for a time,
Days of Our Lives, save the soap opera, crediting Scott with turning DAYS around and helping it to secure 13 Emmy nods. Here's what Scott, who Logan reports has three
feature films in the works, has to say:
“It’s proof a show can turn around in these difficult times, a soap can be saved,” Scott says. “There needs to be leadership, drive, positive energy and a respect for the audience—but that’s nothing new. It’s old-school stuff. Of course, you don’t have all the time in the world. You need to work hard and work fast.”
While I readily agree Scott brought a new energy and vision to DAYS during his brief tenure, by allegedly violating the Writers Guild of America Minimum Basic Agreement by re-writing scripts and reportedly encouraging certain actors to do the same —two of whom are no longer with the serial—thus giving head hack Dena Higley the ammo she needed to reportedly seek out the assistance of the WGA, therefore plunging the soap into a bitter, behind-the-scenes tug of war with Scott and said actors on one side, and Dena Higley on the other, while Ken Corday was allegedly no where to be found when time came to referee, Scott did much to offset the positive steps he was taking in an attempt to get the show back on track. Besides, Emmy nominations are great and all, but DAYS didn't really begin to slowly get its act together storywise and tonally until current executive producer Gary Tomlin took over the reigns. I don't think all of Tomlin and co-head writer Chris Whitesell's hard work cleaning up the behind-the-scenes messes made by Corday, Scott and Higley should be overlooked all because of one impressive Emmy reel.
Diva: There's still no proof that Scott rewrote anything. One actor told me that Scott didn't rewrite any more than any other producer. Most of this was a rumor spread by The Douchebag. The Douchebag claimed that Ali Sweeney did the rewrites, yet she's still on the show. Which of the fired actors rewrote anything? If he's referring to SN and MBE asking that the Steve naked in bed with Ava thing be addressed by Steve and Kayla, that's really minor. They asked for that to be in the script, it wasn't a rewrite. And they were right, it needed to be discussed on air. You don't find your husband naked in bed with an ex and not talk about it!
Are things better now behind the scenes? Really? Tomlin fired all the vets, so that's supposed to make for a happy work environment? Does the show look better now from a production stand point? No. It doesn't. Is the show better from an acting standpoint? OH HELL NO on that one. Tomlin has said that looking pretty is what matters, not talent, which of course explains Nadia Bjorlin's airtime.
Jamey: And of course the interview wouldn't be complete without an actor taking a swipe at the late James E. Reilly's legacy. Check out what the Emmy-nominated Peter Reckell has to say:
“Ed inspired our entire company,” Reckell says. “He gave us back what made Days a part of American culture to begin with. Sure, the devil possession was a big conversation piece, but our show deeply mattered to people when it was about love and loss, family and relationships. Ed understood that.”
While I have adored Reckell since childhood and will continue to do so, as he plays my all-time favorite soap hero, I take issue with his passive aggressive dig at Reilly's greatest epic. Love it, or hate it, the devil possession storyline was much more than a "big conversation piece". The vampires on Port Charles were a big conversation piece, but they didn't spike ratings. Reilly's devil possession storyline managed to cause both watercooler buzz and show NBC the money. People can deny the story's impact all they want, but it won't lessen the bofo surges Reilly's storylines caused for DAYS' ratings during his first stint at the show (92-97). The devil possession storyline took the show to Number 2 in households and caused DAYS to brutalize its competition among women 18-49. Plus the storyline was about love and loss, as all great supernatural metaphors are. Who can ever forget the look on the Salemites faces when their beloved Marlena (Deidre Hall) "died" following her exorcism, only to be resurrected by John's (Drake Hogestyn) love? I wonder, does every DAYS actor who obviously hated this story think shows like True Blood or Buffy The Vampire Slayer or movies like Twilight don't convey stories of "love, loss, family and relationships"?
Diva: Plane crashes are also conversation pieces, but that doesn't mean anyone wants to be in one. Why does everyone forget how good DOOL's ratings were in the 80s? They were good in the 70s as well. Why are only the 90s mentioned?
Actually, I do not remember Marlena dying during her exorcism. I stopped watching the Eileen Davidson show when Penelope or whoever the fuck that was, was found dead in the DiMera pool.
Comparing JER's writing to True Blood, Buffy, and Twilight is insulting to those shows/books. If Jamey would have compared JER's writing to Lost, I would have bitch slapped him right there. There's nothing wrong with writing some Sci Fi on soaps because soaps are a fantasy. But the writing was bad! If you are going to rip off a genre, then do it in a soapy way.
Jamey: Let's face it, Santa Barbara and Another World were, for the most part, much more critically acclaimed dramas than DAYS, but neither survived the 90's. I firmly believe the only reason DAYS did was James E. Reilly.
Diva: Another World and Santa Barbara were far superior shows than DOOL in the 90s. They had both good writing and fantastic actors. AW could be boring at times. It needed to be shook up a little. I'm not sure why SB never did well in the ratings. I don't think JER writing for either show would have saved them. Let's not forget he also wrote for the bottom dweller, Passions, for its entire run. If he's such a ratings genius, then why didn't he save his own show from cancellation?
Jamey: In my opinion, you can't even begin to compare the amount of time and money Reilly's over-the-top storylines bought DAYS, to Scott's short stint in Salem. Almost 20 years later fans are still jizzing over Buried Alive, Marlena's Possession and Kristen, Susan, et al on You Tube and message boards. Something tells me the plane crash that killed Pa Brady— as groovy as it was— won't be alloted as much space in the soap opera history books.
Diva: Thanks to Higley, Corday, and the Douchebag we'll never know what Scott could have done for the show. I guess Jamey didn't notice that Y&R was number one for twenty years, mostly under Scott's production. Scott's contribution to Y&R far exceeds JER's runs on DOOL. Sorry, only the gay boards are still jizzing over the JER stuff. On the other boards, most of the fans are still complaining how that shit make DOOL a joke.
Jamey: And yes, yes, a thousand times yes, Reilly went bat shit crazy the second time around at DAYS, so did several other much more acclaimed writers/producers during their respective second engagements, the late Gloria Monty or Michael Malone anyone? I don't hear anyone lamenting the brilliance of Marty's original rape storyline on One Life to Live because Malone later came back to pen the Santis. When General Hospital savior Monty is brought up, people tend to talk about the magic of Luke and Laura, not the abomination of the Eckerts, or Monty's plan to get rid of the Quartermaines (It looks like Guza learned from the master, er mistress!).
I really wish discussions about the canon of DAYS history can stop being about pre-Reilly vs. post-Reilly. I have watched this show since circa 1982 and am a fan of both the classic, supercouple heavy 80's and the wacked out 90's, and am able to respect the contributions that both eras made to the show's history. I wish others could do the same. Oh well, bring on Crystal Chappell!"
Diva: The Diva can't comment on GH or OLTL other than the fact that the GH fans are so tired of the mob bullshit. As for Jamey liking the 80s, I'll take his word for it since I don't really remember him saying anything nice about the 80s. He spends most of his time defending JER and bashing the actors who bash JER. I'm glad he can respect both eras, but why can't he and others respect that a lot of fans just weren't into the JER stuff? It's a matter of taste.
As far as Crystal is concerned, I'm not a Carly fan at all. Does anyone really seriously think that Higley will magically become a better writer over night just because Crystal is now on the show? She couldn't write for SN, MBE, the DH's, TP, and LH that list included an emmy winner and some emmy nominees. All of a sudden now she's going to write well for Emmy winner Chappell? The Diva can't wait for the bitching and moaning to start when the Carly fans start bashing Higley's bad writing for Carly. Maybe then they'll know what it's a like to be fans of the 3 supercouples that got fired.
